By Hannah Arendt
An research of the character, motives, and importance of violence within the moment 1/2 the 20th century. Arendt additionally reexamines the connection among battle, politics, violence, and gear. “Incisive, deeply probing, written with readability and beauty, it offers an incredible framework for realizing the turbulence of our times”(Nation). Index.
Read Online or Download On Violence (Harvest Book) PDF
Similar philosophy books
Brad Inwood provides a range of his such a lot celebrated essays at the philosophy of Seneca, the Roman Stoic philosopher, statesman, and tragedian of the 1st century advert. together with brand-new items, and a precious creation to orient the reader, this quantity can be a vital consultant for someone trying to comprehend Seneca's very important and wide-ranging proposal.
What's What? may possibly or not it's that famous writer Mark Kurlansky has written a really brief, terrifically witty, deeply thought-provoking booklet totally within the kind of questions? A booklet that attracts on philosophy, faith, literature, policy-indeed, all of civilization-to ask what might be the twenty most crucial questions in human heritage?
The writings of theologians Thierry of Chartres (d. 1157) and Nicholas of Cusa (d. 1464) signify a misplaced background of momentous encounters among Christianity and Pythagorean principles earlier than the Renaissance. Their powerful Christian Neopythagoreanism reconceived the Trinity and the Incarnation in the framework of Greek quantity concept, tough our modern assumptions concerning the relation of faith and glossy technological know-how.
This number of papers on concerns within the concept of psychological illustration expresses a range of contemporary reflections at the concept that C. D. large so aptly characterised within the identify of his e-book brain and the realm Order. a major impetus within the undertaking of organizing this paintings have been the discussions I had with Keith Lehrer whereas i used to be a traveling pupil within the division of Philosophy on the collage of Arizona.
- Philosophy: A Guide to the Reference Literature (3rd Edition)
- The Certainty of Uncertainty: Dialogues Introducing Constructivism
- El concepto de Ideología, Volume 4: Postestructuralismo, Postmodernismo y Postmarxismo
- For the New Intellectual: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand
- Schopenhauer (The Routledge Philosophers)
- An Introduction to Indian Philosophy: Perspectives on Reality, Knowledge, and Freedom
Extra resources for On Violence (Harvest Book)
Wittgenstein goes on to consider how we come to think of perception as a relation between a judging subject, their experience and the world: Wittgenstein on perception: an overview 25 I look into the eye-piece of an instrument and draw or paint a picture of what I see. Whoever looks at it can say: “So that’s how it looks” – but also “So that’s how it looks to you”. I might call the picture a description of what I was looking at, but also a description of my visual impression. (RPP I 1083) But we should not take for granted that this fact reveals that perception is an inherently mediate relation between a subject’s impressions and the world; it may be that the fact that there are two ways of describing the perceptual experience creates the possibility of treating the relationship between subject and world as mediate.
Until one is familiar with ‘the natural history of human beings’, it says nothing to say that human beings can see. And, once one is familiar with it, to be told that humans can see adds nothing to what one already knows (319). These remarks are connected to Wittgenstein’s observations about the limits of physiological explanation of what it is to see. Here the important question is what the logical criterion is for failing to perceive a certain feature of the environment (for example, for failing to see the joy in a smiling face).
One would like to say that the will aﬀects images directly. For if I voluntarily change my visual impression, then things obey my will. (RPP II 91) 22 Michael Campbell and Michael O’Sullivan As Wittgenstein notes, we are inclined to say that our control over images is direct; over sensations, only indirect. But, as these qualiﬁcations show, our understanding of the distinction between active and passive states of the subject presupposes a prior grasp of the diﬀerence between seeing and imagining.