Integral Formulas in Riemannian Geometry by Kentaro Yano

By Kentaro Yano

Show description

Read or Download Integral Formulas in Riemannian Geometry PDF

Similar geometry and topology books

Famous problems of elementary geometry: the duplication of the cube, the trisection of an angle, the quadrature of the circle: an authorized translation of F. Klein's Vorträge

Broadly considered as a vintage of contemporary arithmetic, this elevated model of Felix Klein's celebrated 1894 lectures makes use of modern recommendations to check 3 well-known difficulties of antiquity: doubling the amount of a dice, trisecting an perspective, and squaring a circle. cutting-edge scholars will locate this quantity of specific curiosity in its solutions to such questions as: lower than what conditions is a geometrical development attainable?

Additional info for Integral Formulas in Riemannian Geometry

Example text

Apply Th. 24 to ± Re f and ± Im f . It follows that Re f and Im f have pluriharmonic extensions to X, in particular f extends to f ∈ ∞ (X). By density of X A, d′′ f = 0 on X. 26) Corollary. Let A ⊂ Ω (resp. A ⊂ X) be a closed (pluri)polar set. If Ω (resp. X) is connected, then Ω A (resp. X A) is connected. Proof. If Ω A (resp. X A) is a disjoint union Ω1 ∪ Ω2 of non empty open subsets, the function defined by f ≡ 0 on Ω1 , f ≡ 1 on Ω2 would have a harmonic (resp. holomorphic) extension through A, a contradiction.

X A) is connected. Proof. If Ω A (resp. X A) is a disjoint union Ω1 ∪ Ω2 of non empty open subsets, the function defined by f ≡ 0 on Ω1 , f ≡ 1 on Ω2 would have a harmonic (resp. holomorphic) extension through A, a contradiction. § 6. A. Domains of Holomorphy in Cn . Examples Loosely speaking, a domain of holomorphy is an open subset Ω in Cn such that there is no part of ∂Ω across which all functions f ∈ Ç(Ω) can be extended. 1) Definition. Let Ω ⊂ Cn be an open subset. Ω is said to be a domain of holomorphy if for every connected open set U ⊂ Cn which meets ∂Ω and every connected component V of U ∩ Ω there exists f ∈ Ç(Ω) such that f↾V has no holomorphic extension to U .

However, if v is a plurisubharmonic function on X × Cn , the partial minimum function on X defined by u(ζ) = inf z∈Ω v(ζ, z) need not be plurisubharmonic. A simple counterexample in C × C is given by v(ζ, z) = |z|2 + 2 Re(zζ) = |z + ζ|2 − |ζ|2 , u(ζ) = −|ζ|2 . It follows that the image F (Ω) of a pseudoconvex open set Ω by a holomorphic map F need not be pseudoconvex. In fact, if Ω = {(t, ζ, z) ∈ C3 ; log |t| + v(ζ, z) < 0} and if Ω′ ⊂ C2 is the image of Ω by the projection map (t, ζ, z) −→ (t, ζ), then Ω′ = {(t, ζ) ∈ C2 ; log |t| + u(ζ) < 0} is not pseudoconvex.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.24 of 5 – based on 11 votes