Evidence-Based Imaging: Optimizing Imaging in Patient Care by L. Santiago Medina MD, MPH, C. Craig Blackmore MD, MPH

By L. Santiago Medina MD, MPH, C. Craig Blackmore MD, MPH (auth.)

Evidence-Based Imaging: Optimizing Imaging for sufferer Care provides the radiologist and clinician with a common consultant to the evidence-based technology and the advantage in the back of the diagnostic imaging experiences played in drugs. Edited through Drs. L. Santiago Medina and C. Craig Blackmore, this excellent reference gathers contributions via across the world well known experts within the box. The ebook offers a scientific framework for realizing the simplest imaging offerings for sufferer care. Chapters spotlight key issues that aid the medical purposes, permitting quick entry to pertinent details. themes comprise sufferer choice, imaging options, try functionality, cost-effectiveness, and applicability. 9 significant parts of scientific imaging are lined: Oncology, Neuroimaging, stomach, Thorax, Musculoskeletal, Cardiovascular, Pediatrics, Trauma, and Women's Imaging. Emphasis is put on universal ailments. A wealth of illustrations and precis tables reinforces key evidence.
By delivering a transparent figuring out of the technology in the back of the facts, the publication fills a void for radiologists, clinicians, citizens, and others with an curiosity in clinical imaging and a wish to enforce an evidence-based approach.

Show description

Read or Download Evidence-Based Imaging: Optimizing Imaging in Patient Care PDF

Similar nonfiction_9 books

Grundlagen elektrischer Maschinen, Neunte Auflage

Content material: bankruptcy 1 Transformator (pages 43–201): bankruptcy 2 Allgemeine Betrachtungen uber rotierende elektrische Maschinen (pages 203–281): bankruptcy three Gleichstrommaschine (pages 283–357): bankruptcy four Allgemeine Betrachtungen uber Maschinen mit Drehfeldern als Luftspaltfeld (pages 359–392): bankruptcy five Dreiphasen?

Hadronic Transport Coefficients from Effective Field Theories

This dissertation makes a speciality of the calculation of shipping coefficients within the topic created in a relativistic heavy-ion collision after chemical freeze-out. This topic may be good approximated utilizing a pion fuel out of equilibrium. We describe the theoretical framework had to receive the shear and bulk viscosities, the thermal and electric conductivities and the flavour diffusion coefficients of a meson fuel at low temperatures.

34th Hemophilia Symposium: Hamburg 2003

This ebook comprises the contributions to the thirty fourth Hemophilia Symposium, Hamburg 2003. the most themes are HIV an infection and epidemiology, administration of bleedings in hemophiliacs with inhibitors, orthopedic difficulties and remedy in hemophiliacs, treatment with protein C and pediatric hemostaseology. the amount is rounded off through quite a few loose papers and posters on hemophilia, hemophiliacs with inhibitors, thrombophilia and molecular diagnostics.

Extra resources for Evidence-Based Imaging: Optimizing Imaging in Patient Care

Example text

Mathematically, power is defined as 1 minus beta (1 - b), where b is the probability of having a type II error. Type II errors are commonly referred to as false negatives in a study population. The other type of error is type I or alpha (a), also known as false positives in a study population (7). 10, then the researchers acknowledge they are willing to accept a 10% chance of missing a correlation between abnormal computed tomography (CT) angiographic finding and the diagnosis of carotid artery disease.

3). Lead-time bias results from the earlier detection of the disease, which leads to longer time from diagnosis and an apparent survival advantage but does not truly impact the date of death. Length-time bias relates to the virulence of tumors. 3. Screening biases. For this figure, cancers are assumed to grow at a continuous rate until they reach a size at which death of the subject occurs. At a small size, the cancers may be evident on screening, but not yet evident clinically. This is the preclinical screen detectable phase.

Singer M, Applegate K. Radiology 2001;219:611–620. 16. Weinstein MC, Fineberg HV. Clinical Decision Analysis. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1980. 17. Carlos R. Acad Radiol 2004;11:141–148. 18. Detsky AS, Naglie IG. Ann Intern Med 1990;113:147–154. 19. Doubilet P, Weinstein MC, McNeil BJ. N Engl J Med 1986;314:253–256. 20. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. 21. Hillemann D, Lucas B, Mohiuddin S, Holmberg M.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.67 of 5 – based on 34 votes